Between disinformation tactics and deciphering strategies, towards a semio-political analysis of “fake news” and “alternative facts”

digital

Article

journal	COMUNICAZIONI SOCIALI
section	Open Access
title	Between disinformation tactics and deciphering strategies, towards a semio-political analysis of “fake news” and “alternative facts”
author	Francois Allard-Huver
publisher	Vita e Pensiero
format	Article \| Pdf
online since	12-2017
issn	03928667 (print) \| 18277969 (digital)
Write a comment for this product

Download

Ebook format Pdf readable on these devices:

Computer
with Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
with App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Description Readers' comments
From traditional to digital media, the growth of false information, hoaxes or rumors has recently crystalized in the formulas “fake news” or “alternative facts”, which indicate a certain weakening of critical thinking. These formulas reveal that the public sphere experiences complex epistemological processes, an even more complex relationship to truth and a profound modification of alethurgies. This paper will analyze the “life” of false information in a changing media environment, first by defining what the terms “fake news” and “alternative facts” mean, before subsequently analyzing a recent case study involving different levels of false information and forgeries during the French election, the macronleaks. We will observe the ambiguous role of social networks and the strategies deployed by some actors to decipher false information. Therefore, our aim is to offer a semio-political analysis of “fake news” and “alternative facts” that will help us understand why we are so eager to believe in them, and what to do about them. keywords Veridictory square; fake news; alternative facts; macronleaks; semiology; social networks. Enter a comment for Between disinformation tactics and deciphering strategies, towards a semio-political analysis of “fake news” and “alternative facts”

Description Readers' comments

From traditional to digital media, the growth of false information, hoaxes or rumors has recently crystalized in the formulas “fake news” or “alternative facts”, which indicate a certain weakening of critical thinking. These formulas reveal that the public sphere experiences complex epistemological processes, an even more complex relationship to truth and a profound modification of alethurgies. This paper will analyze the “life” of false information in a changing media environment, first by defining what the terms “fake news” and “alternative facts” mean, before subsequently analyzing a recent case study involving different levels of false information and forgeries during the French election, the macronleaks. We will observe the ambiguous role of social networks and the strategies deployed by some actors to decipher false information. Therefore, our aim is to offer a semio-political analysis of “fake news” and “alternative facts” that will help us understand why we are so eager to believe in them, and what to do about them.